J & A Construction (Scotland) Ltd v Windex Ltd [2013] ScotCS CSOH_170 (30 October 2013)

J & A Construction (Scotland) Ltd v Windex Ltd [2013] ScotCS CSOH_170 (30 October 2013)

Mere balance sheet deficiency or averments of insolvency, absent clear or uncontested evidence or a formal insolvency event, do not justify refusal or delay of enforcement of an adjudicator's award; a dispute existed at the time of referral, satisfying jurisdictional requirements.

Citation
[2013] ScotCS CSOH_170
Parties
Pursuer: J & A Construction (Scotland) Limited; Defender: Windex Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
30 October 2013
Procedural Posture
Commercial Enforcement Action / Judgment on Enforcement of Adjudicator's Award
Outcome
Defenders' pleas-in-law repelled; pursuers' motion for decree granted.
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Adjudicator's Award, Company Insolvency, Balancing of Accounts in Bankruptcy, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Definition of Dispute Under Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996
Construction Law Insolvency Law Commercial Law Enforcement of Adjudicator's Award Company Insolvency Balancing of Accounts in Bankruptcy Jurisdiction of Adjudicator Definition of Dispute Under Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

J & A Construction (Scotland) Limited

Pursuer

Windex Limited

Defender

Procedural Posture

Commercial Enforcement Action / Judgment on Enforcement of Adjudicator's Award

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether balance sheet insolvency or averments of insolvency are a relevant defence to enforcement of an adjudicator's award
  2. 2 Whether the adjudicator had jurisdiction due to crystallisation of a dispute

Ratio Decidendi

Mere balance sheet deficiency or averments of insolvency, absent clear or uncontested evidence or a formal insolvency event, do not justify refusal or delay of enforcement of an adjudicator's award; a dispute existed at the time of referral, satisfying jurisdictional requirements.

Court Disposition

Defenders' pleas-in-law repelled; pursuers' motion for decree granted.

Orders

  • Decree granted in terms of the conclusions of the summons; enforcement of adjudicator's award for £120,000 or thereby.