DEEPMATTER LTD AGAINST THE UNIVERSITY COURT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW [2024] ScotCS CSOH_67 (04 July 2024)
The pursuer has demonstrated a reasonable basis for invoking clause 11.4 of the IPR Option and Royalty Agreement. The court finds that the pursuer is entitled to require the defender to provide information, documentation and assistance as specified, given the factual circumstances, ongoing concerns about unauthorised use, and the defender's resistance to disclosure. The defender's assertion that the pursuer already has sufficient information does not negate the contractual obligation to provide all material reasonably required for enforcement or defence of the Assigned Technology.
- Citation
- [2024] ScotCS CSOH_67
- Parties
- Pursuer: DeepMatter Limited; Defender: The University Court of the University of Glasgow
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Order granted in favour of pursuer
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement of Contractual Obligations, IP Assignment, Patent Licensing, Disclosure Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DeepMatter Limited
Pursuer
The University Court of the University of Glasgow
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer has a reasonable basis to require the defender to provide information, documentation and assistance under clause 11.4 of the IPR Option and Royalty Agreement
- 2 Interpretation of 'reasonably require' in the context of contractual disclosure obligations
- 3 Whether the defender has fulfilled its obligations or is required to produce further material
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer has demonstrated a reasonable basis for invoking clause 11.4 of the IPR Option and Royalty Agreement. The court finds that the pursuer is entitled to require the defender to provide information, documentation and assistance as specified, given the factual circumstances, ongoing concerns about unauthorised use, and the defender's resistance to disclosure. The defender's assertion that the pursuer already has sufficient information does not negate the contractual obligation to provide all material reasonably required for enforcement or defence of the Assigned Technology.
Court Disposition
Order granted in favour of pursuer
Orders
- Defender is ordered to produce the specified documents and information as set out in the schedule appended to the summons, subject to reasonable restrictions as determined by the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment