PETITION BY THE PRESIDING CORONER OF NORTHERN IRELAND AGAINST SOLDIER F [2024] ScotCS CSOH_11 (02 February 2024)
The petition and complaint procedure is competent for enforcement of a certificate of default under section 67(5) of the 1978 Act; the petitioner as coroner has title and interest to bring the proceedings; the respondent's averments challenging the validity of prior rulings and asserting medical unfitness at the material time are irrelevant and excluded from probation, as those matters have been judicially determined and not appealed; only averments relevant to mitigation may be admitted.
- Citation
- [2024] ScotCS CSOH_11
- Parties
- Petitioner: The Presiding Coroner of Northern Ireland; Defender: Soldier F
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Petition and Complaint / Interlocutory Decision on Preliminary Pleas and Relevancy of Pleadings
- Outcome
- Preliminary pleas for the respondent repelled; certain averments excluded from probation; further procedure to be determined after parties reflect on scope of inquiry.
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement of Subpoenas, Judicial Comity, Competency of Petition, Standing/title and Interest, Special Measures for Witnesses, Medical Unfitness as Defence to Contempt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Presiding Coroner of Northern Ireland
Petitioner
Soldier F
Defender
Procedural Posture
Petition and Complaint / Interlocutory Decision on Preliminary Pleas and Relevancy of Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petition and complaint procedure is competent for enforcement of a certificate of default under section 67(5) of the Judicature (Northern Ireland) Act 1978
- 2 Whether the petitioner has title and interest to bring the proceedings
- 3 Whether the respondent's averments regarding medical unfitness and challenge to prior rulings are relevant to the question of contempt
Ratio Decidendi
The petition and complaint procedure is competent for enforcement of a certificate of default under section 67(5) of the 1978 Act; the petitioner as coroner has title and interest to bring the proceedings; the respondent's averments challenging the validity of prior rulings and asserting medical unfitness at the material time are irrelevant and excluded from probation, as those matters have been judicially determined and not appealed; only averments relevant to mitigation may be admitted.
Court Disposition
Preliminary pleas for the respondent repelled; certain averments excluded from probation; further procedure to be determined after parties reflect on scope of inquiry.
Orders
- First four pleas in law for Soldier F repelled
- Averments in answers 10 and 11 after 'quoad ultra denied' excluded from probation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment