Duke of Bedford v. Earl of Galloway's Executor [1904] ScotLR 41_804 (08 July 1904)
The clause of warrandice in the lease, by its express terms, binds only the granter and his successors in the entailed estate, not his executor or general representatives. The intention of the parties was to impose obligations on the Earl during his life and on the heirs of entail after his death, not on his personal representatives. The clause is ineffectual to bind the executor, and the defender is assoilzied.
- Citation
- [1904] ScotLR 41_804
- Parties
- Pursuer: Duke of Bedford and others; Defender: Colonel the Hon. Walter John Stewart, as trustee and executor of the deceased Right Hon. Alan Plantagenet, Earl of Galloway, and as an individual
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 1904
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- defender assoilzied (absolved); interlocutor adhered to
- Legal Topics
- Entail, Lease, Warrandice, Executor Liability, Reduction of Lease
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Duke of Bedford and others
Pursuer
Colonel the Hon. Walter John Stewart, as trustee and executor of the deceased Right Hon. Alan Plantagenet, Earl of Galloway, and as an individual
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the clause of warrandice in the lease binds the executor of the granter of the lease to compensate lessees for outlays and relieve them from liability for future rents after reduction of the lease by a succeeding heir of entail
- 2 Proper construction of the clause of warrandice in the context of an entailed estate
Ratio Decidendi
The clause of warrandice in the lease, by its express terms, binds only the granter and his successors in the entailed estate, not his executor or general representatives. The intention of the parties was to impose obligations on the Earl during his life and on the heirs of entail after his death, not on his personal representatives. The clause is ineffectual to bind the executor, and the defender is assoilzied.
Court Disposition
defender assoilzied (absolved); interlocutor adhered to
Orders
- Defender assoilzied from the conclusions of the action
- Defender entitled to expenses
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment