Paterson v. Inland Revenue [1906] ScotLR 43_692 (07 June 1906)
A separately leased billiard saloon, with no internal communication to the public-house and used as a distinct business, is not part of the 'licensed premises' nor does it fall within 'offices, courts, yards, and gardens therewith occupied' under section 43 of the Inland Revenue Act 1880. Its value cannot be aggregated with the public-house for excise duty purposes.
- Citation
- [1906] ScotLR 43_692
- Parties
- Pursuer/reclaimer: William Cleghorn Paterson; Defender/respondent: Lord Advocate representing Commissioners of Inland Revenue
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 1906
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Lord Ordinary in Exchequer Causes
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Excise Duty, Public House Licensing, Statutory Interpretation, Definition of 'offices', Aggregation of Premises for Duty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Cleghorn Paterson
Pursuer/reclaimer
Lord Advocate representing Commissioners of Inland Revenue
Defender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Lord Ordinary in Exchequer Causes
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a separately leased billiard saloon above a public-house is part of the 'licensed premises' for excise duty under the Inland Revenue Act 1880, section 43
- 2 Whether the billiard saloon constitutes 'offices, courts, yards, and gardens therewith occupied' within the meaning of the Act
Ratio Decidendi
A separately leased billiard saloon, with no internal communication to the public-house and used as a distinct business, is not part of the 'licensed premises' nor does it fall within 'offices, courts, yards, and gardens therewith occupied' under section 43 of the Inland Revenue Act 1880. Its value cannot be aggregated with the public-house for excise duty purposes.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Interlocutor of 7th March 1906 recalled
- Declarator granted in favour of pursuer
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment