Duke of Atholl v. Glover Incorporation of Perth [1900] ScotLR 38_58 (13 November 1900)
The expense of procuring and printing excerpts from session-papers in old cases referred to at debate cannot be charged against the unsuccessful party, as such expenses are for counsel's convenience and not recoverable as costs.
- Citation
- [1900] ScotLR 38_58
- Parties
- Pursuer: Duke of Atholl; Defender: Glover Incorporation of Perth
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 1900
- Procedural Posture
- Expenses Objection / Approval of Auditor's Report
- Outcome
- objection sustained; charge disallowed
- Legal Topics
- Expenses, Taxation, Costs, Session Papers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Duke of Atholl
Pursuer
Glover Incorporation of Perth
Defender
Procedural Posture
Expenses Objection / Approval of Auditor's Report
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the expense of making and printing excerpts from session-papers in old cases referred to at debate can be charged against the unsuccessful party
Ratio Decidendi
The expense of procuring and printing excerpts from session-papers in old cases referred to at debate cannot be charged against the unsuccessful party, as such expenses are for counsel's convenience and not recoverable as costs.
Court Disposition
objection sustained; charge disallowed
Orders
- The Court disallowed the charge objected to for excerpting and printing session-papers.
- Quoad ultra, the Auditor's report was approved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment