Malcolm v. Moore [1901] ScotLR 39_259 (18 December 1901)
Expenses for precognitions taken before adjustment of issues are not recoverable, even if incurred before the date up to which expenses are allowed, as only legitimate and proper expenses are recoverable.
- Citation
- [1901] ScotLR 39_259
- Parties
- Pursuer: Thomas Malcolm; Defender: William Moore
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 1901
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Damages for Slander / Post Trial Expenses Determination
- Outcome
- objection to Auditor's report repelled
- Legal Topics
- Expenses, Tender, Precognitions, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Thomas Malcolm
Pursuer
William Moore
Defender
Procedural Posture
Action of Damages for Slander / Post Trial Expenses Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether expenses for precognitions taken before adjustment of issues are recoverable when expenses are awarded up to the date of tender
Ratio Decidendi
Expenses for precognitions taken before adjustment of issues are not recoverable, even if incurred before the date up to which expenses are allowed, as only legitimate and proper expenses are recoverable.
Court Disposition
objection to Auditor's report repelled
Orders
- Auditor's disallowance of precognition expenses upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment