Magistrates of Aberchirder v. Banff District Committee and Others [1906] ScotLR 43_409 (03 March 1906)
A motion for taxation of expenses as between agent and client under the Public Authorities Protection Act 1893 must be made before the interlocutor awarding expenses is signed; after signature, the Court has no power to alter the interlocutor, and expenses are taxed only as between party and party.
- Citation
- [1906] ScotLR 43_409
- Parties
- Pursuer and Reclaimer: Provost, Magistrates, and Councillors of the Police Burgh of Aberchirder; Defender and Respondent: Banff District Committee of the County Council of the County of Banff; Defender and Respondent: James Campbell, LL.D., Old Cullen, and others, County Road Board of the County of Banff
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 1906
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Motion for Taxation of Expenses as Between Agent and Client After Interlocutor
- Outcome
- motion refused
- Legal Topics
- Expenses, Taxation of Costs, Public Authorities Protection Act 1893, Timing of Motions, Interlocutor
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Provost, Magistrates, and Councillors of the Police Burgh of Aberchirder
Pursuer and Reclaimer
Banff District Committee of the County Council of the County of Banff
Defender and Respondent
James Campbell, LL.D., Old Cullen, and others, County Road Board of the County of Banff
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Motion for Taxation of Expenses as Between Agent and Client After Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a motion for taxation of expenses as between agent and client under the Public Authorities Protection Act 1893 can be made after the interlocutor is signed
- 2 Whether the Court has power to alter an interlocutor awarding expenses in ordinary terms after it is signed
Ratio Decidendi
A motion for taxation of expenses as between agent and client under the Public Authorities Protection Act 1893 must be made before the interlocutor awarding expenses is signed; after signature, the Court has no power to alter the interlocutor, and expenses are taxed only as between party and party.
Court Disposition
motion refused
Orders
- Prayer of the note refused; no alteration to interlocutor; expenses to be taxed as between party and party.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment