DAVID BROWN AGAINST AVIVA INSURANCE [2016] ScotSC 84 (20 December 2016)
The case, though important to the pursuer, was straightforward and could have been conducted by a solicitor; the defenders' instruction of Counsel did not confer an unfair advantage, so certification for Junior Counsel was refused.
- Citation
- [2016] ScotSC 84
- Parties
- Pursuer: David Brown; Defender: Aviva Insurance
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Cause / Post Trial, Determination of Expenses
- Outcome
- Defenders found liable to the pursuer in expenses on the summary cause scale; certification for Junior Counsel refused.
- Legal Topics
- Expenses, Sanction for Counsel, Whiplash Injury, Road Traffic Accident
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Brown
Pursuer
Aviva Insurance
Defender
Procedural Posture
Summary Cause / Post Trial, Determination of Expenses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defenders should be found liable for the pursuer's expenses on the summary cause scale
- 2 Whether the cause should be certified as suitable for the employment of Junior Counsel
Ratio Decidendi
The case, though important to the pursuer, was straightforward and could have been conducted by a solicitor; the defenders' instruction of Counsel did not confer an unfair advantage, so certification for Junior Counsel was refused.
Court Disposition
Defenders found liable to the pursuer in expenses on the summary cause scale; certification for Junior Counsel refused.
Orders
- Defenders liable to pursuer in expenses of the action on the Summary Cause scale as assessed.
- Dr J Martin Simpson certified as a skilled witness for the pursuer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment