Rennie v. Norquoy [2004] ScotSC 36 (18 May 2004)
The sheriff erred in law by disposing of the question of expenses without giving parties an opportunity to be heard, and by deducting £493 from the sum claimed without evidence. The matter of expenses must be remitted to the sheriff for reconsideration after hearing parties.
- Citation
- [2004] ScotSC 36
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Mick Rennie; Defender and Respondent: Magnus Norquoy
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Ordinary Cause (originally Summary Cause, Converted Due to Counterclaim) / Appeal From Sheriff's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Interlocutor varied. Cause remitted to sheriff to reconsider expenses after hearing parties. Defender liable to pursuer for expenses of the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Expenses (costs), Natural Justice, Counterclaim, Summary Cause Procedure, Ordinary Cause Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mick Rennie
Pursuer and Appellant
Magnus Norquoy
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Ordinary Cause (originally Summary Cause, Converted Due to Counterclaim) / Appeal From Sheriff's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff erred in deducting £493 from the sum claimed by the pursuer without evidence
- 2 Whether the sheriff erred in disposing of the question of expenses without giving parties an opportunity to be heard
Ratio Decidendi
The sheriff erred in law by disposing of the question of expenses without giving parties an opportunity to be heard, and by deducting £493 from the sum claimed without evidence. The matter of expenses must be remitted to the sheriff for reconsideration after hearing parties.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Interlocutor varied. Cause remitted to sheriff to reconsider expenses after hearing parties. Defender liable to pursuer for expenses of the appeal.
Orders
- Delete deduction of £493 from sum due; decree for £1,084.45 in favour of pursuer.
- Delete finding that expenses are due to or by neither party.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment