PETITION OF FPS FOR ORDERS UNDER THE CHILD ABDUCTION AND CUSTODY ACT 1985 [2024] ScotCS CSOH_45 (23 April 2024)

PETITION OF FPS FOR ORDERS UNDER THE CHILD ABDUCTION AND CUSTODY ACT 1985 [2024] ScotCS CSOH_45 (23 April 2024)

Both children object to being returned to Spain and are of sufficient age and maturity. Their objections are authentic and based on reasonable fears and negative experiences in Spain. The children's welfare and best interests are better served in Scotland, and the Convention considerations must yield to a child-centric approach. The court refuses to order their return.

Citation
[2024] ScotCS CSOH_45
Parties
Petitioner: FPS; Respondent: First Respondent; Respondent: Second Respondent; Respondent: Third Respondent
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
23 April 2024
Procedural Posture
Petition for Orders Under the Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985 / Final Judgment
Outcome
petition refused
Legal Topics
Child Abduction, Child Custody, Hague Convention, Child Objections, Habitual Residence
Family Law International Law Child Abduction Child Custody Hague Convention Child Objections Habitual Residence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

FPS

Petitioner

First Respondent

Respondent

Second Respondent

Respondent

Third Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition for Orders Under the Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985 / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the retention of Charles and James in Scotland is wrongful under Article 3 of the Hague Convention
  2. 2 Whether the children's objections to return to Spain are sufficient under Article 13 to refuse return
  3. 3 Whether the children's views are authentically their own or influenced by the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

Both children object to being returned to Spain and are of sufficient age and maturity. Their objections are authentic and based on reasonable fears and negative experiences in Spain. The children's welfare and best interests are better served in Scotland, and the Convention considerations must yield to a child-centric approach. The court refuses to order their return.

Court Disposition

petition refused

Orders

  • No order for return of Charles or James to Spain
  • Children to remain in Scotland in the care of the first respondent