Martin & Co (UK) Ltd, Re An Order Under Section 1 of the Administration of Justice Act 1972 [2013] ScotCS CSOH_25 (12 February 2013)
An interim award of expenses is competent and justified in this case to protect the petitioners' right to recover expenses, given the risk of asset dissipation by the respondent and the absence of diligence on the dependence.
- Citation
- [2013] ScotCS CSOH_25
- Parties
- Petitioner: Martin & Co (UK) Limited; Respondent: First Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Order Under Section 1 of the Administration of Justice Act 1972 / Motion for Interim Expenses
- Outcome
- Interim award of expenses granted in favour of petitioners.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Expenses, Recovery of Documents, Franchise Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin & Co (UK) Limited
Petitioner
First Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition for Order Under Section 1 of the Administration of Justice Act 1972 / Motion for Interim Expenses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interim award of expenses is competent and justified to protect the petitioners' right to expenses pending taxation
- 2 Whether special reasons exist for granting an interim award of expenses
Ratio Decidendi
An interim award of expenses is competent and justified in this case to protect the petitioners' right to recover expenses, given the risk of asset dissipation by the respondent and the absence of diligence on the dependence.
Court Disposition
Interim award of expenses granted in favour of petitioners.
Orders
- First respondent ordered to pay £50,000 by way of interim expenses.
- Immediate extract of the order pending agreement or taxation of the account of expenses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment