Ferguson v Dundee City Council [2006] ScotCS CSIH_51 (03 November 2006)
The Committee was entitled to proceed on the material before it, including hearsay, and no reasonable Committee could be prevented from concluding the respondent exercised management and control over the licence; thus, the Committee's adverse finding as to fitness was within its discretion.
- Citation
- [2006] ScotCS CSIH_51
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: James Ferguson; Defenders and Appellants: Dundee City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under the Civic Government (scotland) Act 1982 / Appeal From Sheriff's Interlocutor Reversing Licensing Committee Suspension
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Fit and Proper Person Test, Taxi Licensing, Evidence Assessment, Discretion of Licensing Authority
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Ferguson
Pursuer and Respondent
Dundee City Council
Defenders and Appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under the Civic Government (scotland) Act 1982 / Appeal From Sheriff's Interlocutor Reversing Licensing Committee Suspension
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was a fit and proper person to hold a taxi driver's licence
- 2 Whether the licensing committee exercised its discretion reasonably
- 3 Whether hearsay and other evidence was sufficient for suspension
Ratio Decidendi
The Committee was entitled to proceed on the material before it, including hearsay, and no reasonable Committee could be prevented from concluding the respondent exercised management and control over the licence; thus, the Committee's adverse finding as to fitness was within its discretion.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Sheriff's interlocutor reversed
- Suspension of respondent's taxi driver's licence reinstated for unexpired period
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment