THE RT HON DOROTHY BAIN, KC, HIS MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE FOR AN ORDER UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE COURTS REFORM (SCOTLAND) ACT 2014 IN RESPECT OF FORBES BRUCE SIME [2023] ScotCS CSIH_23 (08 June 2023)
The respondent has habitually and persistently instituted civil proceedings and made applications to the court without any reasonable ground, all of which lacked substantive merit and were attempts to re-litigate previously determined matters. The proceedings were vexatious, and it is in the interests of justice to grant the order sought.
- Citation
- [2023] ScotCS CSIH_23
- Parties
- Petitioner: THE RT HON DOROTHY BAIN, KC, HIS MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE; Respondent: FORBES BRUCE SIME
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Vexatious Litigant Order / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition granted
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Litigation, Court Access Restrictions, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE RT HON DOROTHY BAIN, KC, HIS MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE
Petitioner
FORBES BRUCE SIME
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition for Vexatious Litigant Order / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent has habitually and persistently instituted vexatious civil proceedings or made vexatious applications without reasonable ground under section 101 of the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent has habitually and persistently instituted civil proceedings and made applications to the court without any reasonable ground, all of which lacked substantive merit and were attempts to re-litigate previously determined matters. The proceedings were vexatious, and it is in the interests of justice to grant the order sought.
Court Disposition
Petition granted
Orders
- Vexatious litigant order made against Forbes Bruce Sime under section 100 of the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014
- Expenses of process awarded in favour of the Lord Advocate
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment