Barry Ostlere & Shepherd Ltd v Edinburgh Cork Importing Co [1909] ScotCS CSIH_2 (05 June 1909)
The pursuers were entitled to assume the defenders' agent had authority to conclude the contract; the document constituted an order pursuant to a concluded contract, not merely an offer. The defenders' conduct and correspondence confirmed the existence of a binding contract. The Lord Ordinary's judgment is recalled and damages awarded to the pursuers.
- Citation
- [1909] ScotCS CSIH_2
- Parties
- Pursuer: Barry, Ostlere, & Shepherd, Limited; Defender: Edinburgh Cork Importing Co.
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 1909
- Procedural Posture
- Contract Dispute / Appeal
- Outcome
- judgment for pursuers
- Legal Topics
- Formation of Contract, Agent's Authority, Breach of Contract, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barry, Ostlere, & Shepherd, Limited
Pursuer
Edinburgh Cork Importing Co.
Defender
Procedural Posture
Contract Dispute / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a binding contract was concluded at the interview of 29th January 1907
- 2 Whether the agent Lawrie had authority to bind the defenders
- 3 Whether the document No. 56 of process constituted an order or merely an offer
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuers were entitled to assume the defenders' agent had authority to conclude the contract; the document constituted an order pursuant to a concluded contract, not merely an offer. The defenders' conduct and correspondence confirmed the existence of a binding contract. The Lord Ordinary's judgment is recalled and damages awarded to the pursuers.
Court Disposition
judgment for pursuers
Orders
- Lord Ordinary's judgment recalled
- Pursuers entitled to damages
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment