Stobo Ltd v Morrisons (Gowns) Ltd [1949] ScotCS CSIH_1 (28 January 1949)
The Court held that the inclusion of the words 'subject to contract' in the defenders' acceptance letter indicated that no final assent or concluded agreement had been reached between the parties. The correspondence did not amount to a binding contract, and thus the pursuers' case for specific implement failed.
- Citation
- [1949] ScotCS CSIH_1
- Parties
- Pursuer: Stobo Limited; Defender: Morrisons (Gowns) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 1949
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Substitute's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Formation of Contract, Conditional Acceptance, Missives of Sale, Specific Implement, Rei Interventus
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stobo Limited
Pursuer
Morrisons (Gowns) Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Substitute's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether correspondence between parties constituted a concluded contract for the sale of property
- 2 Effect of the phrase 'subject to contract' in Scots law
- 3 Relevance of rei interventus in the absence of a concluded contract
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the inclusion of the words 'subject to contract' in the defenders' acceptance letter indicated that no final assent or concluded agreement had been reached between the parties. The correspondence did not amount to a binding contract, and thus the pursuers' case for specific implement failed.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; action dismissed
Orders
- Interlocutor of the Sheriff-substitute recalled
- Defenders assoilzied (absolved from the conclusions of the action)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment