Gawthorpe v Stewart [2000] ScotCS 294 (27 November 2000)

Gawthorpe v Stewart [2000] ScotCS 294 (27 November 2000)

The court held that the alleged contract was void for uncertainty, as the obligation on the pursuer to 'take up residence' was too vague and indefinite, lacking any specified duration or mutuality corresponding to the defender's lifelong obligation. The pleadings did not disclose clear offer and acceptance sufficient to constitute a binding contract.

Citation
[2000] ScotCS 294
Parties
Pursuer: Mrs Alexandra Gawthorpe; Defender: Kenneth Stewart
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
27 November 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil / Procedure Roll (plea to Relevancy and Specification)
Outcome
action dismissed as irrelevant
Legal Topics
Formation of Contract, Certainty of Terms, Heritable Property, Testamentary Bequest
Contract Law Property Law Formation of Contract Certainty of Terms Heritable Property Testamentary Bequest

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs Alexandra Gawthorpe

Pursuer

Kenneth Stewart

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Procedure Roll (plea to Relevancy and Specification)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a verbal contract existed between the parties for transfer or bequest of heritable property
  2. 2 Whether the alleged contract was sufficiently definite to be enforceable
  3. 3 Whether mutual obligations existed to constitute a binding contract

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the alleged contract was void for uncertainty, as the obligation on the pursuer to 'take up residence' was too vague and indefinite, lacking any specified duration or mutuality corresponding to the defender's lifelong obligation. The pleadings did not disclose clear offer and acceptance sufficient to constitute a binding contract.

Court Disposition

action dismissed as irrelevant

Orders

  • Action dismissed.