Clackmannanshire Council (Forth Valley Rape Crisis Centre; LGBT Youth Scotland) [2022] ScotIC 139_2022 (05 December 2022)

The Commissioner found that Clackmannanshire Council failed to comply with the requirements of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 by not providing the requested information.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2022] ScotIC 139_2022
Parties: Respondent: Clackmannanshire Council; Applicant: Forth Valley Rape Crisis Centre; Applicant: LGBT Youth Scotland
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judgment Date: 05 December 2022
Procedural Posture: Freedom of Information Appeal / Final Decision
Outcome: Appeal upheld
Legal Topics: Freedom of Information, Public Authority Disclosure

Administrative Law Information Law Freedom of Information Public Authority Disclosure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Clackmannanshire Council

Respondent

Forth Valley Rape Crisis Centre

Applicant

LGBT Youth Scotland

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Freedom of Information Appeal / Final Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether Clackmannanshire Council complied with its obligations under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002

Ratio Decidendi

The Commissioner found that Clackmannanshire Council failed to comply with the requirements of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 by not providing the requested information.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld

Orders

Clackmannanshire Council must disclose the requested information to the applicants

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.