Macfarlane, Strang, & Co., Ltd v. Bank of Scotland [1903] ScotLR 40_746 (03 July 1903)

Macfarlane, Strang, & Co., Ltd v. Bank of Scotland [1903] ScotLR 40_746 (03 July 1903)

The pursuers, as trade creditors who did not take shares in the company, have no relevant claim against the bank for losses arising from the company's insolvency, even if the bank promoted the company fraudulently to secure its own debt. Liability for fraudulent prospectus or company promotion is limited to allottees of shares, not to those who merely trade with the company. No actionable misrepresentation was made to the pursuers, and the bank owed them no duty in the circumstances.

Citation
[1903] ScotLR 40_746
Parties
Pursuer: Macfarlane, Strang, & Company, Limited; Defender: Bank of Scotland
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
03 July 1903
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Dismissal
Outcome
appeal dismissed; action dismissed as irrelevant
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Company Promotion, Liability of Banks, Creditor Claims, Prospectus Liability
Company Law Banking Law Fraud Fraudulent Misrepresentation Company Promotion Liability of Banks Creditor Claims Prospectus Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Macfarlane, Strang, & Company, Limited

Pursuer

Bank of Scotland

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Dismissal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a creditor of a company can recover losses from a bank alleged to have fraudulently promoted the company to secure its own debt.
  2. 2 Whether the bank's alleged fraudulent conduct in the flotation of the company gives rise to liability to a supplier who traded with the company but was not a shareholder.

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuers, as trade creditors who did not take shares in the company, have no relevant claim against the bank for losses arising from the company's insolvency, even if the bank promoted the company fraudulently to secure its own debt. Liability for fraudulent prospectus or company promotion is limited to allottees of shares, not to those who merely trade with the company. No actionable misrepresentation was made to the pursuers, and the bank owed them no duty in the circumstances.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; action dismissed as irrelevant

Orders

  • Action dismissed
  • Defenders entitled to expenses