Galbraith (Macdougall's Trustee) v. Ironside [1913] ScotLR 144 (13 December 1913)

Galbraith (Macdougall's Trustee) v. Ironside [1913] ScotLR 144 (13 December 1913)

In the absence of an averment that the debtor was conscious of his own insolvency at the time of granting the security, an action for reduction on the ground of fraudulent preference at common law is irrelevant and must be dismissed, regardless of the creditor's knowledge or dual role as agent and banker.

Citation
[1913] ScotLR 144
Parties
Pursuer: William Brodie Galbraith (Macdougall's Trustee); Defenders: William Ironside and Peter Moir
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
13 December 1913
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Allowance of Proof Before Answer
Outcome
action dismissed
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Preference, Reduction of Security, Debtor's Consciousness of Insolvency, Agency and Fiduciary Duty
Bankruptcy Property Law Fraudulent Preference Reduction of Security Debtor's Consciousness of Insolvency Agency and Fiduciary Duty

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Brodie Galbraith (Macdougall's Trustee)

Pursuer

William Ironside and Peter Moir

Defenders

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Allowance of Proof Before Answer

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a security granted by an insolvent to a creditor can be reduced for fraudulent preference at common law without averment that the debtor was conscious of his own insolvency
  2. 2 Whether knowledge of insolvency by the creditor or their dual role as agent and banker creates a specialty justifying proof

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of an averment that the debtor was conscious of his own insolvency at the time of granting the security, an action for reduction on the ground of fraudulent preference at common law is irrelevant and must be dismissed, regardless of the creditor's knowledge or dual role as agent and banker.

Court Disposition

action dismissed

Orders

  • Recall of the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor allowing proof before answer
  • Sustained first plea-in-law for defenders