Standard Commercial Property Securities Ltd, Re Application For Judicial Review [2000] ScotCS 228 (15 August 2000)
The Council's decision to promote a CPO and enter into a back-to-back agreement with Atlas was not ultra vires. The Council acted within its statutory powers under section 189 of the 1997 Act, having regard to the need for comprehensive redevelopment and the difficulties posed by multiple ownership. The Council was entitled to consider the broader planning context and to enter into an agreement with a developer capable of delivering the scheme. The statutory requirements of section 191 did not preclude the agreement, and the Council's actions were not shown to be unreasonable or for an improper purpose.
- Citation
- [2000] ScotCS 228
- Parties
- Petitioner: Standard Commercial Property Securities Limited; Respondent: Glasgow City Council; Interested Party: Atlas Investments Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / First Hearing Before Outer House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Petition refused
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Purchase Orders, Ultra Vires, Judicial Review, Planning Permission, Disposal of Land by Local Authorities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Standard Commercial Property Securities Limited
Petitioner
Glasgow City Council
Respondent
Atlas Investments Ltd
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / First Hearing Before Outer House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Glasgow City Council's decision to promote a Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO) and enter into a back-to-back agreement with Atlas Investments Ltd was ultra vires and unreasonable under the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997.
- 2 Whether the Council failed to take into account relevant and material considerations, including the petitioner's development proposals.
- 3 Whether the Council's agreement to dispose of land to Atlas in advance of acquisition complied with statutory requirements, particularly section 191 of the 1997 Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Council's decision to promote a CPO and enter into a back-to-back agreement with Atlas was not ultra vires. The Council acted within its statutory powers under section 189 of the 1997 Act, having regard to the need for comprehensive redevelopment and the difficulties posed by multiple ownership. The Council was entitled to consider the broader planning context and to enter into an agreement with a developer capable of delivering the scheme. The statutory requirements of section 191 did not preclude the agreement, and the Council's actions were not shown to be unreasonable or for an improper purpose.
Court Disposition
Petition refused
Orders
- Refusal of declarator that the decision was ultra vires and falls to be reduced.
- Refusal of declarator that the agreement was ultra vires and falls to be reduced.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment