Mackenzie Petitioner. v. Simpson Petitioner [1921] ScotLR 468 (27 May 1921)
The Court has no power to allocate a portion of feu-duties to the sinking fund in place of casualties, as the statute does not provide for this and the Court cannot modify statutory provisions. The expenses of the application must be declared a permanent burden on the glebe as per the statutory scheme.
- Citation
- [1921] ScotLR 468
- Parties
- Petitioner: Rev. Neil Kennedy Mackenzie; Petitioner: Rev. James S. Simpson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 1921
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Authority to Feu Glebe Land / Judgment on Application and Expenses
- Outcome
- application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Glebe Lands, Feudal Tenure, Statutory Interpretation, Permanent Burdens, Sinking Fund
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rev. Neil Kennedy Mackenzie
Petitioner
Rev. James S. Simpson
Petitioner
Procedural Posture
Petition for Authority to Feu Glebe Land / Judgment on Application and Expenses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court can allocate a portion of feu-duties to the sinking fund in place of casualties under the changed statutory regime
- 2 How expenses of application to feu glebe land are to be treated post-Feudal Casualties (Scotland) Act 1914
Ratio Decidendi
The Court has no power to allocate a portion of feu-duties to the sinking fund in place of casualties, as the statute does not provide for this and the Court cannot modify statutory provisions. The expenses of the application must be declared a permanent burden on the glebe as per the statutory scheme.
Court Disposition
application granted in part
Orders
- Authority to feu the glebe granted.
- Expenses of the application declared a permanent burden on the glebe, with interest as a first charge on the revenue until extinguished.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment