Clydesdale Bank Plc, Re Application For Sequestration [2000] ScotCS 81 (24 March 2000)
The petition for sequestration is competent without naming individual partners, the oath was lodged in sufficient time and form, no sufficient security exists to prevent sequestration as the standard securities are not capable of immediate realisation, and the appointment of Mr McGruther as permanent trustee is appropriate.
- Citation
- [2000] ScotCS 81
- Parties
- Petitioner: Clydesdale Bank plc; Respondent: Grantly Developments
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Sequestration / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Sequestration awarded; pleas-in-law for the firm repelled; permanent trustee appointed.
- Legal Topics
- Sequestration, Competency of Petition, Statutory Requirements, Security for Debt, Appointment of Trustee
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clydesdale Bank plc
Petitioner
Grantly Developments
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition for Sequestration / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petition for sequestration is competent without naming partners of the firm
- 2 Whether the oath by the creditor was lodged in accordance with statutory requirements
- 3 Whether sufficient security for payment of the debt exists to prevent sequestration
Ratio Decidendi
The petition for sequestration is competent without naming individual partners, the oath was lodged in sufficient time and form, no sufficient security exists to prevent sequestration as the standard securities are not capable of immediate realisation, and the appointment of Mr McGruther as permanent trustee is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Sequestration awarded; pleas-in-law for the firm repelled; permanent trustee appointed.
Orders
- Award sequestration of the estates of Grantly Developments
- Appoint Duncan Donald McGruther as permanent trustee
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment