Royal Bank of Scotland v Greenshields [1914] ScotCS CSIH_1 (14 January 1914)
No specific question was put to the bank-agent requiring disclosure of the customer's full indebtedness, and no misrepresentation was proved; therefore, no duty of disclosure arose and the guarantee remains valid.
- Citation
- [1914] ScotCS CSIH_1
- Parties
- Pursuer: Royal Bank of Scotland; Defender: Greenshields (deceased, represented by representatives)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 1914
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Inner House Appeal From Outer House
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Guarantee, Misrepresentation, Duty of Disclosure, Banker Customer Relationship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Royal Bank of Scotland
Pursuer
Greenshields (deceased, represented by representatives)
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Inner House Appeal From Outer House
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a bank-agent owes a duty of disclosure to an intending guarantor regarding a customer's total indebtedness
- 2 Whether misrepresentation or non-disclosure by the bank-agent vitiates the guarantee
Ratio Decidendi
No specific question was put to the bank-agent requiring disclosure of the customer's full indebtedness, and no misrepresentation was proved; therefore, no duty of disclosure arose and the guarantee remains valid.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary recalled
- Decree granted in favour of the pursuers (Royal Bank of Scotland) in terms of the conclusions of the summons
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment