Cowan v. The Royal Bank Of Scotland Plc [2011] ScotCS CSOH_85 (17 May 2011)
The pursuer failed to establish a prima facie case for interim suspension or interdict due to insufficient and unsupported averments, lack of offer of restitutio in integrum, and unexplained delay in seeking protective orders. The balance of convenience did not favour the pursuer.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotCS CSOH_85
- Parties
- Pursuer: Douglas Hugh Cowan; Defender: The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interim Application for Suspension and Interdict
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Guarantee, Misrepresentation, Reduction, Interim Interdict, Sequestration, Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Douglas Hugh Cowan
Pursuer
The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interim Application for Suspension and Interdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer has established a prima facie case for interim suspension of a charge and interim interdict against sequestration based on alleged misrepresentation regarding a guarantee.
- 2 Whether the balance of convenience favours granting interim protective orders.
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer failed to establish a prima facie case for interim suspension or interdict due to insufficient and unsupported averments, lack of offer of restitutio in integrum, and unexplained delay in seeking protective orders. The balance of convenience did not favour the pursuer.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Application for interim suspension and interim interdict refused.
- Award of expenses granted against the pursuer and in favour of the defender.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment