HAT AGAINST CW [2020] SC EDIN 37 (10 February 2020)

HAT AGAINST CW [2020] SC EDIN 37 (10 February 2020)

The court found that the evidence supported the applicant's claim of abuse and that a protective order was necessary for their protection.

Citation
[2020] SC EDIN 37
Parties
Applicant: HAT; Respondent: CW
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
10 February 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
protective order granted
Legal Topics
Protective Orders, Domestic Abuse
Family Law Protective Orders Domestic Abuse

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HAT

Applicant

CW

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a protective order should be granted against the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the evidence supported the applicant's claim of abuse and that a protective order was necessary for their protection.

Court Disposition

protective order granted

Orders

  • The respondent is prohibited from approaching or contacting the applicant.