Hay's Trs v Baillie [1908] ScotCS CSIH_1 (18 July 1908)
The Court held that the testatrix intended 'benevolent' and 'charitable' as synonymous, describing a single class of institutions. The bequest is valid as it is sufficiently certain for trustees to execute, and the use of both terms does not render the bequest void for uncertainty.
- Citation
- [1908] ScotCS CSIH_1
- Parties
- Applicant: Hay's Trustees; Respondent: Baillie
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Reclaiming Note (appeal) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Charitable Bequests, Construction of Wills, Certainty of Beneficiaries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hay's Trustees
Applicant
Baillie
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Reclaiming Note (appeal) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a bequest to 'societies or institutions of a benevolent or charitable nature' is valid or void for uncertainty under Scots law.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the testatrix intended 'benevolent' and 'charitable' as synonymous, describing a single class of institutions. The bequest is valid as it is sufficiently certain for trustees to execute, and the use of both terms does not render the bequest void for uncertainty.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled
- First branch of the claim for the trustees and executors of Mrs Hay sustained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment