Kelly v. Her Majesty's Advocate [2005] ScotHC HCJAC_126 (23 November 2005)

Kelly v. Her Majesty's Advocate [2005] ScotHC HCJAC_126 (23 November 2005)

The failures alleged in representation and disclosure were either peripheral or did not materially affect the presentation of the defence; the appellant's defence was placed before the jury, and no breach of fair trial rights or miscarriage of justice occurred.

Citation
[2005] ScotHC HCJAC_126
Parties
Petitioner: Colin Hugh Kelly; Respondent: Her Majesty's Advocate
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
23 November 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Conviction / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal refused
Legal Topics
Defective Representation, Disclosure Obligations, Fair Trial, Article 6 ECHR
Criminal Law Human Rights Law Defective Representation Disclosure Obligations Fair Trial Article 6 ECHR

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Colin Hugh Kelly

Petitioner

Her Majesty's Advocate

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal Against Conviction / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether defective representation denied the appellant a fair trial
  2. 2 Whether Crown's failure to disclose a witness statement breached fair trial rights
  3. 3 Whether failures in cross-examination impacted the reliability and credibility of witnesses

Ratio Decidendi

The failures alleged in representation and disclosure were either peripheral or did not materially affect the presentation of the defence; the appellant's defence was placed before the jury, and no breach of fair trial rights or miscarriage of justice occurred.

Court Disposition

Appeal refused

Orders

  • Appeal against conviction refused on all grounds