Harris v. Her Majesty's Advocate [2009] ScotHC HCJAC_85 (24 September 2009)
Once an appeal against conviction on indictment has been finally determined, it is not competent for the High Court to review that decision except under express statutory powers governing references from the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission; section 124(2) of the 1995 Act and binding precedent preclude further review by petition to the nobile officium.
- Citation
- [2009] ScotHC HCJAC_85
- Parties
- Petitioner: Stuart Harris; Respondent: Her Majesty's Advocate
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Petition to the Nobile Officium / Final Appellate Review
- Outcome
- petition dismissed as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Finality of Conviction, Jurisdiction of Appellate Court, European Convention on Human Rights Article 6, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stuart Harris
Petitioner
Her Majesty's Advocate
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition to the Nobile Officium / Final Appellate Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review a final conviction decision via petition to the nobile officium
- 2 Whether Article 6 ECHR and Human Rights Act 1998 require reopening of conviction appeals
- 3 Whether section 124(2) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 precludes further review
Ratio Decidendi
Once an appeal against conviction on indictment has been finally determined, it is not competent for the High Court to review that decision except under express statutory powers governing references from the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission; section 124(2) of the 1995 Act and binding precedent preclude further review by petition to the nobile officium.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed as incompetent
Orders
- Petition to the nobile officium refused
- No re-opening of conviction appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment