Liquidator of Clyde Marine Insurance Co. v. Herbert Renwick & Co., And La Societe Anonyme De Periandros [1923] ScotLR 114 (30 November 1923)
Marine insurance slips initialled prior to liquidation do not create legally enforceable obligations to issue policies; liquidator not carrying on business is not entitled or bound to issue policies or claim premiums; issuance of policies post-liquidation without authority is ultra vires; Court lacks jurisdiction to direct implementation of obligations binding only in honour.
- Citation
- [1923] ScotLR 114
- Parties
- Petitioner: Eric Portlock, F.C.A., Liquidator for Clyde Marine Insurance Company, Limited; Respondent: Herbert Renwick & Company; Respondent: La Société Anonyme de Periandros
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 1923
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Companies (consolidation) Act 1908, S.193 / Judgment on Test Cases in Voluntary Liquidation
- Outcome
- All questions in Case 1 and Case 2 (except Case 2, question 4) answered in the negative; Case 2, question 4 answered in the affirmative.
- Legal Topics
- Marine Insurance, Voluntary Liquidation, Liquidator's Powers and Duties, Validity of Insurance Contracts, Honourable Obligations Vs Legal Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eric Portlock, F.C.A., Liquidator for Clyde Marine Insurance Company, Limited
Petitioner
Herbert Renwick & Company
Respondent
La Société Anonyme de Periandros
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under Companies (consolidation) Act 1908, S.193 / Judgment on Test Cases in Voluntary Liquidation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a marine insurance slip initialled prior to liquidation creates a legally enforceable obligation to issue a policy
- 2 Whether the liquidator may or must issue policies in respect of slips initialled before liquidation
- 3 Whether the liquidator's issuance of policies after liquidation is ultra vires
Ratio Decidendi
Marine insurance slips initialled prior to liquidation do not create legally enforceable obligations to issue policies; liquidator not carrying on business is not entitled or bound to issue policies or claim premiums; issuance of policies post-liquidation without authority is ultra vires; Court lacks jurisdiction to direct implementation of obligations binding only in honour.
Court Disposition
All questions in Case 1 and Case 2 (except Case 2, question 4) answered in the negative; Case 2, question 4 answered in the affirmative.
Orders
- Liquidator not bound or entitled to issue policies in respect of slips initialled before liquidation.
- Liquidator's issuance of policies post-liquidation is ultra vires and not binding.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment