Wallace v University Court of St Andrews [1904] ScotCS CSIH_2 (20 July 1904)
The defenders' title, based on a charter confirmed by the Crown and Parliament and followed by uninterrupted possession for more than forty years, is indefeasible and superior to the pursuer's unperfected and unpossessed personal title under the contract of excambion.
- Citation
- [1904] ScotCS CSIH_2
- Parties
- Pursuer: Wallace; Defender: University Court of St Andrews
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 1904
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Heritable Title, Glebe Lands, Prescription, Sasine, Excambion, Possession
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wallace
Pursuer
University Court of St Andrews
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer is entitled to a declarator that the lands known as Cockshaugh and Toll Park are the glebe of the parish of St Leonard and belong heritably to him and his successors in the cure.
- 2 Whether the defenders have an indefeasible heritable title to the lands in question based on charter, possession, and prescription.
- 3 Whether the contract of excambion in 1854 conferred a heritable title on the pursuer.
Ratio Decidendi
The defenders' title, based on a charter confirmed by the Crown and Parliament and followed by uninterrupted possession for more than forty years, is indefeasible and superior to the pursuer's unperfected and unpossessed personal title under the contract of excambion.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary affirmed
Orders
- Defenders assoilzied (absolved) from the conclusions of the summons.
- Affirmation of the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor, with deletion of the words 'or at least for twenty years'.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment