(1) HIGHLAND COUNCIL AGAINST SCOTTISH MINISTERS and COMBINED POWER AND HEAT (HIGHLANDS) Ltd and (2) ROSS ESTATES COMPANY against SCOTTISH MINISTERS and COMBINED POWER AND HEAT (HIGHLANDS) Ltd [2014] ScotCS CSIH_74 (28 August 2014)
Condition 2 was invalid because it enlarged the permission beyond what was applied for and considered at inquiry, depriving parties of the opportunity to address the implications and failing to comply with EIA requirements. The error was not severable; the whole planning permission must be quashed. Other grounds of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotCS CSIH_74
- Parties
- Appellant: Highland Council; Appellant: Ross Estates Company; First Respondent: Scottish Ministers; Second Respondent: Combined Power and Heat (Highlands) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Planning Appeal Under Section 239 of the Town and Country Planning (scotland) Act 1997 / Appeal From Reporter’s Decision to the Inner House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; planning permission quashed in its entirety due to invalidity of condition 2.
- Legal Topics
- Planning Permission, Environmental Impact Assessment, Waste Management, Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions, Conditions of Planning Consent
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Highland Council
Appellant
Ross Estates Company
Appellant
Scottish Ministers
First Respondent
Combined Power and Heat (Highlands) Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Planning Appeal Under Section 239 of the Town and Country Planning (scotland) Act 1997 / Appeal From Reporter’s Decision to the Inner House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether condition 2 of the planning permission, permitting importation of waste from outside Highland area, was valid
- 2 Whether the Reporter failed to properly consider road safety at Tomich Junction
- 3 Whether the Reporter failed to properly apply the waste hierarchy, assess need, proximity, and other criteria under Policy 70
Ratio Decidendi
Condition 2 was invalid because it enlarged the permission beyond what was applied for and considered at inquiry, depriving parties of the opportunity to address the implications and failing to comply with EIA requirements. The error was not severable; the whole planning permission must be quashed. Other grounds of appeal were not made out.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; planning permission quashed in its entirety due to invalidity of condition 2.
Orders
- Decision of Reporter quashed in its entirety; planning permission set aside.
- Case remitted for further consideration limited to condition 2.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment