MRK1 Ltd v Sajur & Ors [2011] ScotCS CSOH_34 (17 February 2011)
Defenders were given multiple opportunities to state a defence but failed to do so. The pursuers were entitled to decree for implement of the missives by payment of the purchase price, as no valid defence was advanced and further indulgence would unfairly expose pursuers to additional expense.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotCS CSOH_34
- Parties
- Pursuer: MRK 1 Limited; Defender: Mohammed Zahir Sakur; Defender: Suneia Momade; Defender: The Firm of Sara Properties
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Ordinary Action / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- decree granted for implement
- Legal Topics
- Implement of Missives, Quantification of Loss, Unjust Enrichment, Fraud, Expenses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MRK 1 Limited
Pursuer
Mohammed Zahir Sakur
Defender
Suneia Momade
Defender
The Firm of Sara Properties
Defender
Procedural Posture
Ordinary Action / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Are the defenders bound to implement the missives of purchase?
- 2 Is there a valid defence to implement based on fraud or unjust enrichment?
- 3 What is the proper quantification of loss?
Ratio Decidendi
Defenders were given multiple opportunities to state a defence but failed to do so. The pursuers were entitled to decree for implement of the missives by payment of the purchase price, as no valid defence was advanced and further indulgence would unfairly expose pursuers to additional expense.
Court Disposition
decree granted for implement
Orders
- Defenders ordained to implement missives by payment of £1,555,000.
- Defenders found liable in expenses of process.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment