McGregor Construction (Highlands) Ltd v Difsl Reorganisation Ltd [2000] ScotCS 167 (16 June 2000)

McGregor Construction (Highlands) Ltd v Difsl Reorganisation Ltd [2000] ScotCS 167 (16 June 2000)

The defenders breached the implied term to exercise reasonable skill and care by providing a screed with an aggregate/cement ratio materially leaner than 4:1 by volume, resulting in defective flooring. This breach was at least a material cause of the failure, entitling the pursuers to damages.

Citation
[2000] ScotCS 167
Parties
Pursuer: McGregor Construction (Highlands) Limited; Defender: DIFSL Reorganisation Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
16 June 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Proof
Outcome
judgment for pursuer
Legal Topics
Implied Terms, Breach of Contract, Standard of Care, Subcontractor Liability, Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

McGregor Construction (Highlands) Limited

Pursuer

DIFSL Reorganisation Limited

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment After Proof

  1. 1 Whether the defenders breached the implied term to exercise reasonable skill and care as specialist flooring contractors
  2. 2 Whether the defects in the flooring were caused by breach of contract by the defenders
  3. 3 Whether loading from trolleys or defects in the subfloor contributed to the failure

Ratio Decidendi

The defenders breached the implied term to exercise reasonable skill and care by providing a screed with an aggregate/cement ratio materially leaner than 4:1 by volume, resulting in defective flooring. This breach was at least a material cause of the failure, entitling the pursuers to damages.

Court Disposition

judgment for pursuer

Orders

  • Decree for the pursuers in the sum of £39,529.58 with interest at 8% per annum from the date of citation until payment
  • Repel defenders' first, second, third and fifth pleas-in-law