Goodwins, Jardine, & Co., Ltd v. Charles Brand & Son [1905] ScotLR 42_806 (19 July 1905)
The arbitration clause from the principal contract was not incorporated into the sub-contract for matters outside the subject-matter of the principal contract, such as disputes over price between contractor and sub-contractor; incorporation applies only to matters inseparable from execution of works affecting both contracts.
- Citation
- [1905] ScotLR 42_806
- Parties
- Pursuer: Goodwins, Jardine, & Company, Limited; Pursuer: James Watson Stewart, C. A., Glasgow, the liquidator thereof; Defender: Charles Brand & Son
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 1905
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal on Interlocutor, Proof Allowed, Remitted to Lord Ordinary
- Outcome
- Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; proof allowed; case remitted to Lord Ordinary for proof.
- Legal Topics
- Incorporation of Arbitration Clause, Sub Contracts, Reference to Specification, Scope of Arbitration Clause
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Goodwins, Jardine, & Company, Limited
Pursuer
James Watson Stewart, C. A., Glasgow, the liquidator thereof
Pursuer
Charles Brand & Son
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal on Interlocutor, Proof Allowed, Remitted to Lord Ordinary
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitration clause in the principal contract was incorporated into the sub-contract between pursuers and defenders
- 2 Whether disputes between contractor and sub-contractor, specifically as to price, fall within the scope of the arbitration clause
Ratio Decidendi
The arbitration clause from the principal contract was not incorporated into the sub-contract for matters outside the subject-matter of the principal contract, such as disputes over price between contractor and sub-contractor; incorporation applies only to matters inseparable from execution of works affecting both contracts.
Court Disposition
Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; proof allowed; case remitted to Lord Ordinary for proof.
Orders
- Recall interlocutor sustaining arbitration plea
- Allow parties proof of respective averments
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment