Milne v. E. & J. Birrell [1902] ScotLR 39_656 (14 June 1902)
The Court held that it is unreasonable for a creditor, after payment of the debt, to refuse to discharge the inhibition unless the debtor pays both the expenses of imposition and discharge. The creditor is liable for the expenses of the petition and any necessary expenses for complete removal of the inhibition.
- Citation
- [1902] ScotLR 39_656
- Parties
- Petitioner: William Milne; Respondents: E. & J. Birrell
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 1902
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Recal of Inhibition / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition granted
- Legal Topics
- Inhibition, Discharge of Inhibition, Expenses of Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Milne
Petitioner
E. & J. Birrell
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Petition for Recal of Inhibition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a creditor is entitled to demand from a debtor the expenses of both imposing and discharging an inhibition after the debt has been paid
- 2 Whether the creditor should be found liable for the expenses of the petition for recal and removal of inhibition
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that it is unreasonable for a creditor, after payment of the debt, to refuse to discharge the inhibition unless the debtor pays both the expenses of imposition and discharge. The creditor is liable for the expenses of the petition and any necessary expenses for complete removal of the inhibition.
Court Disposition
petition granted
Orders
- Recal the inhibition taken out by E. & J. Birrell on 21st March 1902 against William Milne
- Grant warrant for marking the inhibition as discharged in the Register of Inhibitions upon production of a certified copy of the interlocutor
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment