Allseas UK Ltd v Greenpeace Ltd [2001] ScotCS 88 (11 April 2001)
The court held that the pursuers had a reasonable apprehension of harm based on the defenders' clear opposition to oil and gas exploitation, their recent history of direct disruptive actions, and their refusal to provide an undertaking. The balance of convenience favoured the pursuers, and the interdict was justified.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 88
- Parties
- Pursuer: Allseas UK Limited; Defender: Greenpeace Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interim Interdict Application
- Outcome
- interim interdict granted
- Legal Topics
- Interdict, Apprehension of Harm, Protest Actions, Balance of Convenience
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allseas UK Limited
Pursuer
Greenpeace Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interim Interdict Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interim interdict should be granted where no delict has yet been committed but there is reasonable apprehension of harm from protest actions.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the pursuers had a reasonable apprehension of harm based on the defenders' clear opposition to oil and gas exploitation, their recent history of direct disruptive actions, and their refusal to provide an undertaking. The balance of convenience favoured the pursuers, and the interdict was justified.
Court Disposition
interim interdict granted
Orders
- Interim interdict granted against Greenpeace Limited within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court, limited to the contract period and specifically defined vessel operations.
- Pursuers awarded costs of the hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment