THE ADULTS WITH INCAPACITY (SCOTLAND) ACT 2000 BY ADRIAN DOUGLAS WARD, SOLICITOR OF MESSRS TC YOUNG TURNBULL AND WARD, 54 MAIN STREET, BARRHEAD, GLASG [2014] ScotSC 4 (14 January 2014)
The sheriff erred in refusing the application solely on the basis of a mental health officer's oral submission and without proper evidential hearing; the court must be satisfied by appropriate evidence, including medical testimony, that the WI adult had testamentary capacity when expressing testamentary intention and that intention remains current. The matter is remitted for proof before a different sheriff.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotSC 4
- Parties
- Pursuer: Adrian Douglas Ward, Solicitor of Messrs TC Young Turnbull & Ward; Interested Party: East Renfrewshire Council; Subject of Application: WI adult (unnamed, person with incapacity)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Application Under the Adults With Incapacity (scotland) Act 2000 / Appeal From Sheriff to Sheriff Principal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sheriff's refusal of crave 5 recalled; case remitted for proof before a different sheriff.
- Legal Topics
- Intervention Orders, Testamentary Capacity, Statutory Wills, Court Procedure in Incapacity Cases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adrian Douglas Ward, Solicitor of Messrs TC Young Turnbull & Ward
Pursuer
East Renfrewshire Council
Interested Party
WI adult (unnamed, person with incapacity)
Subject of Application
Procedural Posture
Summary Application Under the Adults With Incapacity (scotland) Act 2000 / Appeal From Sheriff to Sheriff Principal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can grant an intervention order authorising a solicitor to execute a will on behalf of an adult with incapacity (WI adult) under the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000.
- 2 What evidential standard and procedural safeguards are required before such an order can be granted, specifically regarding proof of testamentary capacity.
Ratio Decidendi
The sheriff erred in refusing the application solely on the basis of a mental health officer's oral submission and without proper evidential hearing; the court must be satisfied by appropriate evidence, including medical testimony, that the WI adult had testamentary capacity when expressing testamentary intention and that intention remains current. The matter is remitted for proof before a different sheriff.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sheriff's refusal of crave 5 recalled; case remitted for proof before a different sheriff.
Orders
- Recall of the sheriff's interlocutor dated 5 September 2013 refusing crave 5.
- Remit to the sheriff for hearing of proof on testamentary capacity and intention.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment