STEPHEN AND ANOTHER, PETITION OF AS THE JOINT ADMINISTRATORS OF GRANITE CITY ASSETS LIMITED [2018] ScotCS CSOH_55 (01 June 2018)
Granite's obligation to repay deposits to BridgePoint Purchasers is a secured debt if the Purchasers have a jus quaesitum tertio to enforce clause 15 or clause 21 of the Master Agreement; such a right exists if there was delivery or equivalent of the Master Agreement to them; further inquiry is needed to determine...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] ScotCS CSOH_55
- Parties
- Petitioner: James Bernard Stephen; Petitioner: Francis Graham Newton; Company Subject to Administration: Granite City Assets Limited; Respondent: IPN Global Capital Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Directions Under Insolvency Act 1986 / Judgment on Construction of Security and Third Party Rights
- Outcome
- Further inquiry required; case put out by order for discussion and procedure.
- Legal Topics
- Secured Liabilities, Standard Security, Jus Quaesitum Tertio, Third Party Rights, Priority of Creditors
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Bernard Stephen
Petitioner
Francis Graham Newton
Petitioner
Granite City Assets Limited
Company Subject to Administration
IPN Global Capital Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition for Directions Under Insolvency Act 1986 / Judgment on Construction of Security and Third Party Rights
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sums paid by BridgePoint Purchasers are secured under the standard security
- 2 Whether BridgePoint Purchasers have enforceable third party rights (jus quaesitum tertio)
- 3 Proper construction of indemnity and repayment obligations under Master Agreement
Ratio Decidendi
Granite's obligation to repay deposits to BridgePoint Purchasers is a secured debt if the Purchasers have a jus quaesitum tertio to enforce clause 15 or clause 21 of the Master Agreement; such a right exists if there was delivery or equivalent of the Master Agreement to them; further inquiry is needed to determine if delivery or equivalent occurred.
Court Disposition
Further inquiry required; case put out by order for discussion and procedure.
Orders
- Case to be put out by order to discuss interlocutor and further procedure.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment