Bryson v. J. Dunn & Stephen, Ltd [1905] ScotLR 43_236 (14 December 1905)
There is no legal rule requiring reduction of compensation when a workman earns secondary wages, provided total compensation and wages do not exceed pre-accident earnings; the arbitrator's discretion is paramount within statutory limits.
- Citation
- [1905] ScotLR 43_236
- Parties
- Respondent: William Bryson; Appellant: J. Dunn & Stephen, Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 1905
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Arbitration Under Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; award of arbitrator affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Partial Incapacity, Discretion of Arbitrator, Amount of Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Bryson
Respondent
J. Dunn & Stephen, Ltd.
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Arbitration Under Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an employer is entitled to reduction of compensation when a workman is earning secondary wages but total compensation does not exceed pre-accident earnings
- 2 Scope of arbitrator's discretion under Workmen's Compensation Act 1897
Ratio Decidendi
There is no legal rule requiring reduction of compensation when a workman earns secondary wages, provided total compensation and wages do not exceed pre-accident earnings; the arbitrator's discretion is paramount within statutory limits.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; award of arbitrator affirmed.
Orders
- Dismiss the appeal
- Affirm the award of the arbitrator
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment