HM Advocate v Bell [2001] ScotCS 72 (23 March 2001)
The respondent's repeated litigation on matters already decided, devoid of comprehensible grounds of action, and targeting new parties, constitutes vexatious conduct justifying an order under the 1898 Act. The statutory requirements and orders for caution are not incompatible with Article 6 ECHR.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 72
- Parties
- Petitioner: Her Majesty's Advocate; Respondent: James Bell
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Petition Under the Vexatious Actions (scotland) Act 1898 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition granted
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Litigant, Access to Justice, Court Procedure, Human Rights (article 6 Echr)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty's Advocate
Petitioner
James Bell
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition Under the Vexatious Actions (scotland) Act 1898 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent should be declared a vexatious litigant under the Vexatious Actions (Scotland) Act 1898
- 2 Whether the respondent's repeated litigation constitutes abuse of process
- 3 Whether the statutory provisions and orders for caution are compatible with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent's repeated litigation on matters already decided, devoid of comprehensible grounds of action, and targeting new parties, constitutes vexatious conduct justifying an order under the 1898 Act. The statutory requirements and orders for caution are not incompatible with Article 6 ECHR.
Court Disposition
petition granted
Orders
- Respondent declared a vexatious litigant under the Vexatious Actions (Scotland) Act 1898
- Respondent prohibited from raising further proceedings without leave of a Lord Ordinary
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment