PETITION OF GRAEME CAMPBELL AGAINST JAMES CAMPBELL AND ANOTHER [2010] ScotCS CSOH_3 (20 January 2021)

PETITION OF GRAEME CAMPBELL AGAINST JAMES CAMPBELL AND ANOTHER [2010] ScotCS CSOH_3 (20 January 2021)

The test for removal of executors at common law has not been met. There is no evidence of malversation of office, persistent and wilful neglect, administrative deadlock, or irreconcilable conflict of interest. The executors' errors arose from lack of legal advice, not bad faith. The administration of the estate can still be completed in accordance with the will. Removal is therefore refused at this stage.

Parties
Petitioner: Graeme Sutherland Campbell; Respondent: James Campbell; Respondent: Margaret Anne Campbell
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
20 January 2021
Procedural Posture
Petition for Removal of Executors and Appointment of Judicial Factor / Opinion After Proof (final Judgment at First Instance)
Outcome
Petition refused in hoc statu (at this stage)
Legal Topics
Removal of Executors, Judicial Factor Appointment, Executry Administration, Fiduciary Duties, Conflict of Interest, Accounting to Beneficiaries
Trusts and Estates Succession Law Removal of Executors Judicial Factor Appointment Executry Administration Fiduciary Duties Conflict of Interest Accounting to Beneficiaries

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Graeme Sutherland Campbell

Petitioner

James Campbell

Respondent

Margaret Anne Campbell

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition for Removal of Executors and Appointment of Judicial Factor / Opinion After Proof (final Judgment at First Instance)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondents should be removed as executors and a judicial factor appointed
  2. 2 Whether the executors breached fiduciary duties or engaged in malversation of office
  3. 3 Whether there was an impermissible conflict of interest justifying removal

Ratio Decidendi

The test for removal of executors at common law has not been met. There is no evidence of malversation of office, persistent and wilful neglect, administrative deadlock, or irreconcilable conflict of interest. The executors' errors arose from lack of legal advice, not bad faith. The administration of the estate can still be completed in accordance with the will. Removal is therefore refused at this stage.

Court Disposition

Petition refused in hoc statu (at this stage)

Orders

  • Prayer of the petition for removal of executors and appointment of judicial factor refused
  • Leave granted to petitioner to reapply by note if executry cannot be satisfactorily completed