HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE v. JAMES DUFF FOR AN ORDER UNDER THE VEXATIOUS ACTIONS (SCOTLAND) ACT 1898 [2013] ScotCS CSIH_50 (12 June 2013)
The respondent has habitually and persistently raised actions and appeals, all dismissed as irrelevant, incompetent, or lacking specification, with repeated allegations unsupported by evidence. The cumulative effect justifies an order under section 1 of the Vexatious Actions (Scotland) Act 1898 to protect the interests of justice, opponents, and court resources.
- Citation
- [2013] ScotCS CSIH_50
- Parties
- Petitioner: The Right Honourable Elish Angiolini QC, Her Majesty's Advocate; Respondent: James Duff
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition granted
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Litigation, Access to Justice, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Right Honourable Elish Angiolini QC, Her Majesty's Advocate
Petitioner
James Duff
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent has habitually and persistently instituted vexatious legal proceedings without reasonable ground under the Vexatious Actions (Scotland) Act 1898
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent has habitually and persistently raised actions and appeals, all dismissed as irrelevant, incompetent, or lacking specification, with repeated allegations unsupported by evidence. The cumulative effect justifies an order under section 1 of the Vexatious Actions (Scotland) Act 1898 to protect the interests of justice, opponents, and court resources.
Court Disposition
petition granted
Orders
- Respondent declared a vexatious litigant under section 1 of the Vexatious Actions (Scotland) Act 1898
- No legal proceedings to be instituted by respondent in any court without leave of a judge sitting in the Outer House on the Bills in the Court of Session
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment