Fife Coal Co., Ltd v. Lindsay [1908] ScotLR 317 (17 January 1908)
The Court held that the statutory machinery under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 provides the exclusive remedy for disputes regarding the amount or duration of compensation, and that a registered agreement remains enforceable until varied by statutory means. The complainers' failure to use the statutory procedure precluded them from seeking suspension of the charge in the Court of Session.
- Citation
- [1908] ScotLR 317
- Parties
- Complainer: Fife Coal Company, Limited; Respondent: James Lindsay
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Suspension of Charge (civil) / Inner House, Second Division, on Reclaiming Motion
- Outcome
- suspension refused; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Variation of Registered Agreements, Statutory Remedies Vs. Common Law Remedies, Enforcement of Compensation Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fife Coal Company, Limited
Complainer
James Lindsay
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Suspension of Charge (civil) / Inner House, Second Division, on Reclaiming Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a registered agreement for compensation can be superseded by subsequent unregistered agreements for reduced compensation
- 2 Whether the Court of Session can entertain a suspension of a charge based on a registered agreement when statutory remedies exist under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897
- 3 Whether the respondent was entitled to claim the maximum compensation after alleged total incapacity recurred
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the statutory machinery under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 provides the exclusive remedy for disputes regarding the amount or duration of compensation, and that a registered agreement remains enforceable until varied by statutory means. The complainers' failure to use the statutory procedure precluded them from seeking suspension of the charge in the Court of Session.
Court Disposition
suspension refused; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to
Orders
- Refusal of the note of suspension
- Charge found to have proceeded orderly
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment