Apollo Engineering Ltd v James Scott Ltd [2008] ScotCS CSOH_39 (07 March 2008)
The arbiter's power to award expenses is inherent and not restricted to final decree arbitral; the arbiter acted within his discretion in dismissing claims on relevancy; no real or apparent bias was established; judicial review is not available to challenge the merits of the arbiter's decisions.
- Citation
- [2008] ScotCS CSOH_39
- Parties
- Petitioner: Apollo Engineering Limited; Respondent: James Scott Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Petition / Final Judgment at First Hearing
- Outcome
- Petition for judicial review dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Arbiter's Powers, Award of Expenses, Judicial Review, Bias in Arbitration, Dismissal of Claims on Relevancy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Apollo Engineering Limited
Petitioner
James Scott Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Petition / Final Judgment at First Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbiter had power to make an award of expenses prior to final decree arbitral
- 2 Whether the arbiter could dismiss claims on relevancy without proof
- 3 Whether there was real or apparent bias by the arbiter
Ratio Decidendi
The arbiter's power to award expenses is inherent and not restricted to final decree arbitral; the arbiter acted within his discretion in dismissing claims on relevancy; no real or apparent bias was established; judicial review is not available to challenge the merits of the arbiter's decisions.
Court Disposition
Petition for judicial review dismissed.
Orders
- Petition dismissed.
- Expenses granted to respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment