Woolfe v. Colquhoun [1912] ScotLR 911 (12 July 1912)

Woolfe v. Colquhoun [1912] ScotLR 911 (12 July 1912)

A fisherman employed under a contract of service, paid a fixed wage and an additional commission based on gross earnings, is not excluded from compensation under section 7(2) of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906, as his true and substantial remuneration is by wages, not by a share in profits or gross earnings.

Citation
[1912] ScotLR 911
Parties
Respondent: Joseph Walter Woolfe; Appellant: John Colquhoun
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
12 July 1912
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court (case Stated) / Pre Proof, Legal Question on Exclusion Under Statute
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; respondent entitled to proceed to proof.
Legal Topics
Workmen's Compensation, Master and Servant, Remuneration by Shares, Statutory Exclusion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Walter Woolfe

Respondent

John Colquhoun

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Sheriff Court (case Stated) / Pre Proof, Legal Question on Exclusion Under Statute

  1. 1 Whether a fisherman paid both a fixed wage and a commission based on gross earnings is excluded from compensation under section 7(2) of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906.

Ratio Decidendi

A fisherman employed under a contract of service, paid a fixed wage and an additional commission based on gross earnings, is not excluded from compensation under section 7(2) of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906, as his true and substantial remuneration is by wages, not by a share in profits or gross earnings.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; respondent entitled to proceed to proof.

Orders

  • Sheriff-Substitute's interlocutor affirmed; proof allowed.