Woolfe v. Colquhoun [1912] ScotLR 911 (12 July 1912)
A fisherman employed under a contract of service, paid a fixed wage and an additional commission based on gross earnings, is not excluded from compensation under section 7(2) of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906, as his true and substantial remuneration is by wages, not by a share in profits or gross earnings.
- Citation
- [1912] ScotLR 911
- Parties
- Respondent: Joseph Walter Woolfe; Appellant: John Colquhoun
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 1912
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Sheriff Court (case Stated) / Pre Proof, Legal Question on Exclusion Under Statute
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; respondent entitled to proceed to proof.
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Master and Servant, Remuneration by Shares, Statutory Exclusion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Walter Woolfe
Respondent
John Colquhoun
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court (case Stated) / Pre Proof, Legal Question on Exclusion Under Statute
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a fisherman paid both a fixed wage and a commission based on gross earnings is excluded from compensation under section 7(2) of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906.
Ratio Decidendi
A fisherman employed under a contract of service, paid a fixed wage and an additional commission based on gross earnings, is not excluded from compensation under section 7(2) of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906, as his true and substantial remuneration is by wages, not by a share in profits or gross earnings.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; respondent entitled to proceed to proof.
Orders
- Sheriff-Substitute's interlocutor affirmed; proof allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment