Balfour Melville v. Dalziel [1903] ScotLR 40_332 (29 January 1903)

Balfour Melville v. Dalziel [1903] ScotLR 40_332 (29 January 1903)

The Court refused to recall the curator bonis because the recall was sought only on the condition that a trust deed be executed, which would continue to supersede the father as administrator and did not provide better protection for the minor's interests than the existing judicial administration. The Court held that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1903] ScotLR 40_332
Parties
Petitioner: Evan Whyte Melville Balfour Melville; Petitioner: James Heriot Balfour Melville; Respondent: John Dalziel, C.A.
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
29 January 1903
Procedural Posture
Petition for Recall of Curator Bonis / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Refusal
Outcome
petition refused; Court adhered to Lord Ordinary's decision
Legal Topics
Parental Rights, Administration of Minor's Estate, Curator Bonis, Judicial Factors, Recall of Curator, Trust Deed
Family Law Succession Law Trusts and Estates Parental Rights Administration of Minor's Estate Curator Bonis Judicial Factors Recall of Curator +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Evan Whyte Melville Balfour Melville

Petitioner

James Heriot Balfour Melville

Petitioner

John Dalziel, C.A.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition for Recall of Curator Bonis / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Refusal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Court should recall the appointment of a curator bonis to a minor's estate at the joint request of the minor and his father
  2. 2 Whether a father has an absolute right to resume administration of his minor child's estate after judicial intervention
  3. 3 Whether the proposed trust deed provides adequate protection for the minor's interests

Ratio Decidendi

The Court refused to recall the curator bonis because the recall was sought only on the condition that a trust deed be executed, which would continue to supersede the father as administrator and did not provide better protection for the minor's interests than the existing judicial administration. The Court held that the father does not have an absolute right to resume administration once judicial intervention has occurred, and the proposed alternative was not preferable.

Court Disposition

petition refused; Court adhered to Lord Ordinary's decision

Orders

  • Prayer of the petition refused
  • Curator bonis (Mr Dalziel) to continue administration of the minor's estate