JOHN DAVID McIRVINE v. JOHN ALEXANDER McIRVINE [2012] ScotSC 91 (12 September 2012)
- Citation
- [2012] ScotSC 91
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Posture
- Civil / Judgment
More details
- Posture
- Civil / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The defender's failure to account for business proceeds justified a broad assessment of the pursuer's loss, resulting in an award of £300,000 plus interest from the date of citation.
Court disposition
judgment for the pursuer
Orders
- Decree for £300,000 in favour of the pursuer
- Interest to run from the date of citation
- Award of expenses to the pursuer
- Certification for junior counsel
02
Material facts
Parties
Pursuer
PlaintiffDefender
DefendantAmounts and remedies
- Awarded Damages: GBP 300,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Assessment of damages due to defender's failure to account
- 02
Entitlement to expenses
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The pursuer claimed the defender failed to account for business proceeds, including farm subsidy and cattle sales, resulting in a significant financial shortfall.
- Respondent
- The defender, representing himself, did not provide a satisfactory account or justification for the missing funds.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
judicial discretion
Where a party fails to account, the court may make a broad assessment of loss and round upward in the claimant's favour.
- 02
general costs principle
Successful party is entitled to expenses unless there is a sound reason to the contrary.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The defender's failure to account for business proceeds justified a broad assessment of the pursuer's loss, resulting in an award of £300,000 plus interest from the date of citation.
Obiter and limits
- The employment of junior counsel was justified due to the complexity and preparation required.
Court disposition
judgment for the pursuer
- Decree for £300,000 in favour of the pursuer
- Interest to run from the date of citation
- Award of expenses to the pursuer
- Certification for junior counsel
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
in the name of the pursuer and presumably used by him for tax purposes. At that point the bank account was in credit of approximately £ 74,000. The profit on the farm, as taken from the four sets of accounts, was building up to a figure between £ 20,000 and £ 25,000. Accordingly for the two years to the cessation of the defender's running of the business a figure of around £ 50,000 could reasonably have been added to that balance making approximately £ 125,000. The actual balance at that point was a debit balance of £ 157,000 so the difference is £ 282,000. This forms one general basis for assessment. There are, of course, numerous other factors. Amongst these are the pursuer's own drawings from the account and his ownership of the arguably improved property and the defender's accounting failures particularly with regard to the sale of the farm subsidy and complete failure to account for the cattle ownership and sales. I am inclined, very much on a broad brush basis, to take the view that many of the factors balance many others, and to utilise the above figure as a base, it having some foundation in reality. Given that this exercise is required by the defender's failure to account it is appropriate that it be rounded upward. I have accordingly awarded a figure of £ 300,000 and granted decree for that sum. Interest will run from the date of citation as craved. [37] The pursuer
has largely succeeded in this action. It was necessary for him to raise proceedings to effect a resolution to the dispute. In absence of any sound reason to the contrary he is entitled to an award of expenses. I accept that notwithstanding that the defender represented himself this is an unusual case involving the requirement for careful and thorough preparation to an extent that the employment of junior counsel was justified. I have certified it accordingly. Sheriff of Grampian Highland and Islands at Aberdeen September 2012. BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.