Kent v. Porter [1901] ScotLR 38_482 (20 March 1901)
An accident occurring 800 yards from the factory premises is not 'on or in or about' the factory within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897, and therefore the employer is not liable for compensation under the Act.
- Citation
- [1901] ScotLR 38_482
- Parties
- Appellant: John Kent; Respondent: David Porter
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 1901
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal in Arbitration Under Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 / Judgment on Question of Law
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; application for compensation dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Scope of Employment, Definition of Factory, Liability for Workplace Accidents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Kent
Appellant
David Porter
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal in Arbitration Under Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 / Judgment on Question of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an accident occurring 800 yards from the employer's factory premises is 'on or in or about' a factory within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897, sec. 7, sub-sec. (1)
- 2 Whether the employer is liable to pay compensation under the Act for such an accident
Ratio Decidendi
An accident occurring 800 yards from the factory premises is not 'on or in or about' the factory within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897, and therefore the employer is not liable for compensation under the Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; application for compensation dismissed.
Orders
- Question of law answered in the negative.
- Remitted to Sheriff-Substitute to dismiss the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment