Aitchison v. M'Donald [1910] ScotLR 185 (23 November 1910)
A charge cannot be served on a club member based solely on a decree against the club; the value of the cause for jurisdictional purposes includes both principal and expenses, exceeding £50, thus making the suspension competent in the Court of Session.
- Citation
- [1910] ScotLR 185
- Parties
- Complainer/reclaimer: George Aitchison; Respondent: John M'Donald
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Suspension of Charge (civil) / Inner House, First Division, Reclaiming Motion (appeal)
- Outcome
- Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; note of suspension passed; suspension granted; complainer entitled to expenses.
- Legal Topics
- Competency of Suspension, Privative Jurisdiction, Sheriff Courts (scotland) Act 1907, Liability of Club Members, Validity of Charge
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Aitchison
Complainer/reclaimer
John M'Donald
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Suspension of Charge (civil) / Inner House, First Division, Reclaiming Motion (appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a charge can be served on a club member based on a decree against the club
- 2 Whether the Court of Session has jurisdiction to entertain the suspension given the value of the cause and the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907
Ratio Decidendi
A charge cannot be served on a club member based solely on a decree against the club; the value of the cause for jurisdictional purposes includes both principal and expenses, exceeding £50, thus making the suspension competent in the Court of Session.
Court Disposition
Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; note of suspension passed; suspension granted; complainer entitled to expenses.
Orders
- Recall of interlocutor of 15th September 1910
- Remit to Lord Ordinary on the bills to pass the note
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment